Anonymous >> #22395
Posted on 2013-04-15 00:56:09 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
do we not already have a copy of this?

Beelzebibble >> #22396
Posted on 2013-04-15 01:00:50 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
If we do, it's not tagged "racheme". Or "multiple_personas", or "trees", or "underwater", or both "solo" and "book". So I'm gonna say probably not, but I'll keep an eye out.

ElementJester >> #22399
Posted on 2013-04-15 01:31:36 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Considering how relatively recent most of those tags are, I'm not exactly sure how good of an indicator that is for our having it. The image is a year old evidently, so it might be buried deep in the archives.

Nyre >> #22400
Posted on 2013-04-15 01:31:57 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
It might have also been eaten in the move. That's always a thing that could have happened.

Pie >> #22401
Posted on 2013-04-15 01:56:38 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Ah sorry I took care of it, there was a smaller dupe. It was like 500 x 1800 or something similar.

Ninety >> #22410
Posted on 2013-04-15 02:34:32 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Seriously, LOVING this tag.

1