NothingSpecial >> #40847
Posted on 2014-04-05 10:44:38 Score: 3 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Should it be tagged with "undergarments"? Or it appropriate for worn only panties?

Beelzebibble >> #40849
Posted on 2014-04-05 15:17:09 Score: 3 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Good question, but nah, I don't think there's any call for "undergarments" here.

Takashi.0 >> #40850
Posted on 2014-04-05 21:45:48 Score: 2 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Really?

Because those are pretty obviously a pair of panties next to her shirt.

Beelzebibble >> #40855
Posted on 2014-04-06 14:50:20 Score: 2 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
If you're serious, then you kind of missed the point...

"undergarments" is for people wearing undergarments (and nothing over them). Why bother in this case?

LonelyCoast >> #40856
Posted on 2014-04-06 16:26:24 Score: 2 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
I second Beelz on this this one

1