Beelzebibble >> #13232
Posted on 2013-02-06 17:32:33 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Did this really merit the "ohgodwhat" tag back in the day?

People on the old imageboard needed a thicker skin.

Snuffleheim >> #13252
Posted on 2013-02-06 21:14:23 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
^I think it more likely that some smartass was expressing their opinion about the bloodswap. Things like that did happen from time to time.

Pie >> #13254
Posted on 2013-02-06 21:24:04 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Things like that happen now.

Vladstronsy >> #13291
Posted on 2013-02-07 00:13:43 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Why?! It's a simple AU, we reserve the ohgodwhat tag for things like satanstuck, other disturbing AU's and cannibalism!
No personal opinions should be brought into tagging.

Beelzebibble >> #13322
Posted on 2013-02-07 02:36:58 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
If you turn "ohgodwhat" upside down and shake it a little, a whole lot of stuff will fall out that really should just be tagged with "wut", or maybe even not at all, like this image.

Attending to that was a project I was working on a while ago. I guess I ought to get back into it considering how liberally "ohgodwhat" has been applied in the past to images that are just weird and dumb, not scary or twisted.

Beelzebibble >> #13323
Posted on 2013-02-07 02:38:30 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
(That being said, stuff like "ohgodwhat", "what", "this_is_stupid", etc. ARE kinda subjective. They are, or at least should be, the only group of judgment-call tags that stray from plain visual objectivity.)

Beelzebibble >> #13324
Posted on 2013-02-07 02:39:07 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
* "wut", not "what" (wish you could edit image comments)

Vladstronsy >> #13343
Posted on 2013-02-07 03:43:10 Score: -1 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
The booru isn't perfect.

nobooks >> #13344
Posted on 2013-02-07 03:46:19 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Diabetes is subjective too.

1