doom_aspect godtier mage non_canon_design quere sepia sollux_captor solo

Edit | Respond



6 comments (0 hidden)

Pie >> #28004
Posted on 2013-06-06 05:01:28 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Huh this is like... semi sepia with a hint of highlight color... not sure how to work the tags or if limited palette...

Beelzebibble >> #28007
Posted on 2013-06-06 05:17:37 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Ummmmm...... I'm..... game for letting this slip in under the radar as sepia. Before sepia was a thing I would have thought we had no choice but to call it limited_palette, but it's just such a classically sepia image besides the eyes, I want to just go for it.

Pie >> #28008
Posted on 2013-06-06 05:19:09 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Yeah this is a bit of a... tag overlap.

We could in theory just do as we do with vague quadrants and tag everything, or we could just list it as sepia. I don't forsee a ton of situations like this so I'm pretty ok with whatever.

Beelzebibble >> #28009
Posted on 2013-06-06 05:35:21 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Maybe highlight_color (which was originally introduced as a standalone category, but maybe not rightly so) should be officially recast as a combinatorial tag. There can be grayscale + highlight_color, monochrome + highlight_color, and sepia + highlight_color.

That would actually be more intuitive and I know there are already a few images that combine those tags. Under the current color rules combining grayscale + highlight_color or monochrome + highlight_color is a "mistake", but maybe there's no reason to see it that way. This is a sepia + highlight_color image if ever there'll be one.

Beelzebibble >> #28010
Posted on 2013-06-06 05:37:30 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
(I hope my penchant for critiquing the system is okay in this case because I was one of the drivers behind highlight_color in the first place.)

Pie >> #28011
Posted on 2013-06-06 05:38:15 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down)   (Report as spam)
Highlight color was originally made for grayscale images that weren't grayscale technically but I personally don't see a slight blurring, I don't think we have to take everything so literally myself.


Sounds like a good idea to bring up to the thread.


1